8.06.2010

Book Review & Double Giveaway! The Red Queen by Philippa Gregory


The Red Queen by Philippa Gregory
Hardcover: 400 pages
Publisher: Touchstone/Simon & Schuster Ltd (August 3, 2010 in USA; August 19 in UK)
ISBN-13: 978-1416563723 & 978-1847374578
Review copy provided by Simon and Schuster, thank you!
The Burton Review Rating:

The Synopsis:
Heiress to the red rose of Lancaster, Margaret Beaufort never surrenders her belief that her house is the true ruler of England and that she has a great destiny before her. Her ambitions are disappointed when her sainted cousin Henry VI fails to recognize her as a kindred spirit, and she is even more dismayed when he sinks into madness. Her mother mocks her plans, revealing that Margaret will always be burdened with the reputation of her father, one of the most famously incompetent English commanders in France. But worst of all for Margaret is when she discovers that her mother is sending her to a loveless marriage in remote Wales.

Married to a man twice her age, quickly widowed, and a mother at only fourteen, Margaret is determined to turn her lonely life into a triumph. She sets her heart on putting her son on the throne of England regardless of the cost to herself, to England, and even to the little boy. Disregarding rival heirs and the overwhelming power of the York dynasty, she names him Henry, like the king; sends him into exile; and pledges him in marriage to her enemy Elizabeth of York’s daughter. As the political tides constantly move and shift, Margaret charts her own way through another loveless marriage, treacherous alliances, and secret plots. She feigns loyalty to the usurper Richard III and even carries his wife’s train at her coronation.

Widowed a second time, Margaret marries the ruthless, deceitful Thomas, Lord Stanley, and her fate stands on the knife edge of his will. Gambling her life that he will support her, she then masterminds one of the greatest rebellions of the time—all the while knowing that her son has grown to manhood, recruited an army, and now waits for his opportunity to win the greatest prize.

In a novel of conspiracy, passion, and coldhearted ambition, number one bestselling author Philippa Gregory has brought to life the story of a proud and determined woman who believes that she alone is destined, by her piety and lineage, to shape the course of history.
The Build Up:

First up, yes, I have a brand new copy to giveaway to one of my lucky followers in the USA! See the bottom of this post for the details on how to enter.

Follow the S&S UK Blogtour with this hashtag on twitter: #pgblogtour

The series website is http://www.warsoftherosesbooks.com/ There are lots of videos here on The Red Queen.

The first competition is live at http://www.simonandschuster.co.uk/sweepstakes/win-a-signed-copy-of-the-red-queen - this is a WORLDWIDE competition to win 1 of 10 SIGNED copies of the UK hardback – the competition will run for the length of the blog tour, closing at the end of September.

Thanks goes out to Simon & Schuster for spreading the Philippa Gregory love! Although, there are many readers who do not like Philippa Gregory, so to those readers I say.. that's fine with me..to each their own. And since there will be quite a few reviews of this novel, I'll try not repeat them. Too much. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and here's mine:

I loved The Other Boleyn Girl by Gregory (runs and hides from the Anne Boleyn fanatics..); the movie.. not so much (redeemed myself..). I also enjoyed Gregory's The Boleyn Inheritance (there I go again!). The Constant Princess was interesting, but the Henry VII characterization was a little strange. Then I read The Queen's Fool, and that was a very engrossing read that I could not put down. I haven't read The Virgin's Lover yet, I am now waiting for a decent span of time before I pick up another Elizabeth I novel. The Other Queen rubbed me the wrong way totally (since I was spoiled by Plaidy's view of Mary Stuart in The Captive Queen and The Royal Road to Fotheringay) and The White Queen was pretty interesting for me even though it was a little over the top with the Melusina/witchcraft mentions.. So now we have the follow up to The White Queen, and the second installment (though not in succession in the timeline) to the Cousins' War as Gregory is calling it, which is more popularly known as the Wars of the Roses. And I love the numerous side stories that all meet up to add to just parts of the colossal Wars of the Roses. I can't adequately determine if I enjoy the Tudor period or the Wars of the Roses more; after this read, I can say it is becoming very hard to still pick Tudor over the Wars. I was very eager to read this book to get yet another point of view, this time from the Lancastrian side, and I was inspired by this read to find more like it.

The Review:
The Red Queen is the story of Margaret Beaufort who is the mother to Henry Tudor, who later becomes Henry VII, who begins the popular Tudor rule. The novel opens to a very pious and somewhat haughty nine year old Margaret who learns that even though she feels destined to be an abbess she is instead to be used as the Lancastrian pawn. She was cousin to the Lancastrian King Henry VI who offered her his half-brother Edmund Tudor to wed. It was at this point that I thought that I disliked Margaret. And unfortunately, when I dislike a main character, I tend to dislike the book, such as part of my issue with The Other Queen.  Warning bells went off. Thankfully, I read further.

What I wanted from this book is entertainment value. Although I have read a few Wars of the Roses books, both fiction and non-fiction, I have not read anything focused on Margaret and I wanted to learn more about her. What made her promise her only son, the precious Lancastrian heir, to the enemy Yorkist Elizabeth Woodville's eldest daughter? What propelled Margaret to continually strive to get her son on the throne? In my Tudor novels, she is often portrayed as the elderly mother to Henry VII, and as being overbearing and obnoxious to Elizabeth of York. So, who really was Margaret of Beaufort? Gregory gives her a voice with this novel, and I was not disappointed.

Gregory portrays her as an annoying child who feels superior to everyone and wants to be noticed as such. Since this is stressed over much with the Joan of Arc theme, it gets a little tiresome. But, after awhile, Margaret grew up into her twenties and thirties and she in turn grew on me. Even though she continued to feel destined for greatness and never doubted herself or Joan of Arc, the story evolved in such a way that Margaret's destiny was something that I could not wait to see how she fulfilled it. If anything, Gregory makes the reader admire Margaret's tenacity. I hated her, liked her, hated her..Perhaps the most intriguing thing for me was that she was devious, yet still pious. Odd combo, eh? Twenty-eight years of waiting for her son to take their family's rightful crown, and the story followed Margaret as she helped to make it happen. And as I have been a Yorkist-in-training with my previous reads, I had always had the lingering impression that the Tudors were a grasping bunch, and that the Beaufort boy was pretty darn lucky to have wound up on the throne like he did all because of a single battle. What a different view this paints! I almost believe that the Yorkists never had a right to be up there at all! (ducks head swiftly..)

And oh, the dear prodigal son Henry.. I have always had him pictured as miserly and almost frail in comparison to his boisterous son, Henry VIII. Gregory shows his character as being a darling brown-headed child that Margaret misses very much during his childhood that he spent with Jasper. The fact that he understood his calling, and that the Lancastrians were so patient before they finally pounced on the Yorks... I was awed. Of course, in order for Lancaster to have a leg to stand on, they needed French backing, and Henry was always looking around for his protector Jasper during the fight.. but still.. very intriguing. I have read books that focused on the York view, from Richard of Gloucester to Elizabeth Woodville, that this Lancastrian view from Margaret Beaufort was really intriguing for me. And Lord Stanley, Margaret's third husband, I do believe he is the epitome of the term "turncoat". Another one of those characters you love to hate. Always an enticing topic, the mystery of the ill-fated princes in the tower was also well played in this telling. Even though it still saddens me when I think of it. How would history be different in they had lived?

I really enjoyed how Gregory wrote this story, and the fact that I am being pleasantly entertained is all that I need when I am settling in to read a novel such as this. Being a casual Wars of the Roses reader, historical inaccuracy was not something that leaped out at me with this read, although again there will be many things that are debatable for all time. I love this era, I love this point of view, and I am so glad that I had a chance to read this novel and get another facet to an important historical event. (ducks again..)

As mentioned in other reviews, the letters that were exchanged between Margaret and her husband or Jasper were so far fetched that their appearances brought the plausibility of the novel to a lower level. Another annoying nagging thought I had while reading this was regarding the title. Who exactly was the Red Queen? Margaret was not it, although perhaps she wanted to be, and supposedly the publishers wanted her to be. The book ends in 1485 with Henry's success and with Margaret once again saying she should be treated as royalty as the king's mother. I can only applaud Margaret's success as well (leaving the horrifying fact aside that she may have had something to do with the murder of innocent children...but we'll never know..). She was only a ruler during her brief regency after her son died in 1509 and a young Henry VIII came to the throne. I wish the publishers had attempted to market this series with titles that would intellectually work for each book. Just because The White Queen title was accurate with the last one doesn't mean the same is true for The Red Queen. The ending sequence with the shift away from Margaret and then a quick obligatory zoom in on her to finish it off was too much of a difference from the rest of the novel, making a good book end in a somewhat corny way which unfortunately takes away from the overall feel of the novel.

With that being said, I believe that anyone with the casual interest in the Wars of the Roses and how they had affected the chain of events that ultimately lead to a successful Tudor rule will find the newest Gregory novel to be an insightful read. And most of the current Philippa Gregory fans know ahead of time what they are getting with her novels, so I doubt they would be too disappointed with this one.


I am giving away both of the current books in The Cousins' War series to my followers in the USA!
For those of you who would like to enter for the chance at their own (unread) Advance Release Copy of The Red Queen and the newly released paperback of The White Queen, (as shown in the graphic) please do the following:
Discuss your opinions of the Wars of The Roses. Where would you have put yourself in the wars: Lancastrian or Yorkist? (mandatory entry)

+3 entries Post the Giveaway graphic on your sidebar, linking to this post.
+2 entries: Facebook, tweet; leave me a link to the post.
You must include your email address so that I can contact you if you win.

I will choose randomly from the entries that have been successfully completed.

USA only! Contest ends August 20, 2010.

33 Witty Commenters Here:

Rachel said...

I would definitely be a Yorkist. I think Richard III has been vilified.

Thank you for the giveaway!

Rachelhwallen@gmail.com

Lindsay :) said...

Just stopping by to let you know I gave you an award over at my blog.

http://justanotherbookaddict.blogspot.com/2010/08/award.html

Cortney Lyon said...

Oh, don't make me choose sides! I think certain people from each side, but not a side as a whole. I guess if I'd have to choose, it would be the York side...I pick them because of the two, they seem the lesser of two evils. I have developed such a negative opinion of Margaret Beaufort (and therefore the Lancastrian side) that it's hard to for me to side with her. I'm super excited about reading 'The Red Queen' after reading your review, maybe I will become a "turncoat" and my hatred for MB will fade...or at least it will be a good read!

I posted it on my sde bar and facebook, the links are below. Thanks again! Great review and give a way.

http://livingandlovingincalifornia.blogspot.com

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?

cortneylyon@gmail.com

Linda said...

I am most definitely for the York side in these wars. I feel like their claim to the throne is much stronger, and I like both Edward IV and Richard III. I've never like Margaret Beaufort but will admit I don't know a lot about her. Thanks for the giveaway.
lcbrower40(at)gmail(dot)com

Tina said...

I don't know enough about the people involved or the issues to choose sides...that's why I need these books: to get me started learning about them in an enjoyable way.

Please enter me.

tbranco AT hughes DOT net

Maggie said...

Honestly I think I'm with the Lancasters... both sides did some not so lovely things... and it came down to battle and Henry VI walked away with the crown. Unfortunately the lure of power tends to have more hold than familial relationships. I always like to think about what would have happened if one itty bitty seemilngly insignificant thing hadn't happened, and how the world would be different now...

Arleigh said...

Very insightful review Marie! This book explained a lot about the Lancastrian cause that I didn't know and I think I must say that I lean toward their side more now than the Yorks. I had thought The Red Queen was on Margaret of Anjou for the longest, because of the title. It is confusing.

amandawk said...

I think I would be with the Lancasters.
amandarwest at gmaildotcom

amandawk said...

Posted on my sidebar talesandtreats.blogspot.com

amandawk said...

Tweeted http://twitter.com/amandawk/status/20486174092

Amy said...

Hmm... interesting question. There is something to be said about a mother who is fighting so hard for her son's cause, so I guess I will side with ole Margaret Beaufort on this one. (Since York seems to be winning in this poll, just to try and even the score :-))

tiger_fan_1997 AT yahoo DOT com

家唐銘 said...

不費勞力而得者,唯貧困而已................................................

Libby's Library said...

I really don't have a clue, but I would sure enjoy reading about them.
Thank you as always, for your wonderful reviews and giveaways.

libneas[at]aol[dot]com

Shannon said...

I wish I knew more about the war of the roses. I read one book, but I was completely confused by it. Better read more. =)
tiredwkids at live dot com

angie said...

I would probably choose the Lancasters. This is because I have read more about their side due to Philippa Gregory's books. I absolutely love her writing!!
I tweeted http://twitter.com/bangersis/status/20556172843
Thanks for this awesome giveaway!

angie said...

It probably helps if I put my email address:) OOPS!!
bangersis(at)msn(dot)com

Chèli said...

I would be a White Rose Yorkist. The purity of the direction of the line should be adhered to.


cyderryATyahooDOTcom
Chèli
Cheli's Shelves

Pricilla said...

Tough one...I suppose I would have to go with the Lancasters. But neither side was exactly pure and noble.

As long as the spammer doesn't win I'm good. heh
kaiminani at gmail dot com

Pricilla said...

I posted on facebook
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1029615540&v=wall&story_fbid=108534329200638#!/pattyleonardwoodland?v=wall&story_fbid=142820052404980

It's on my sidebar at www.brokenteepee.blogspot.com

Thanks
kaiminani at gmail dot com

Pricilla said...

I tweeted
http://twitter.com/BrokenTeepee/status/20565108852
thank you
kaiminani at gmail dot com

Susan Helene Gottfried said...

No need to enter me, babe. I'm dropping in to say cool give. I've got this posted at Win a Book for you.

Ashley said...

I would have to go with the York side because they seemed to have more legitimate claims.

hewella1 at gmail dot com

Meredith said...

I don't think I know enough about the War yet to choose sides. I haven't read many books about this time period.

meredithfl at gmail dot com

Just Mom said...

I'm going Team York but I would say anything for a chance to win these!

theroundfile at live dot com

Michelle @ The True Book Addict said...

I'm not really well-versed on the War of the Roses, but I know enough that I would have to be Lancastrian if there is any truth to Richard III's involvement in the deaths of the Princes. This sounds like a great book and I've also been wanting to read The White Queen. Thanks for the chance!

+3 graphic link on my right sidebar
+2 tweeted: http://twitter.com/truebookaddict/status/20618027234

miller4plusmore(at)bellsouth(dot)net

Benita said...

My knowledge on the matter is scant, but if pressed I'd have to say the York's side. Do we really know the whole truth of what happened?

bgcchs(at)yahoo(dot)com

Michelle said...

Lancastrian all the way. Richard III treated those boys horribly, and we'll never know the truth!

Christine Trent said...

Marie, no need to enter me in this contest, as I just bought this book myself. I agree with your individual assessments of Gregory's books, and am still a fan of her entertaining style. Thanks for the review!

BUSY BEE said...

I am on Team York. I think they have a stronger suit for the throne. Always interesting to read. Would love to have both books...Haven't got a hold of "The White Queen" yet.

thanks

bsyb100 at gmail dot com

Sandee61 said...

I hesitate to choose a side, because I haven't read much about either. I am really interested in learning about them both, so hopefully I can be entered in your giveaway too. Thank you for your reviews of these books. I have read a few of Phillipa Gregory books and enjoyed them.

Blessings,
Sandee61

Muzzley56[at]aol[dot]com

Kaitlyn Devin and Grace said...

Not entering the giveaway because I got the same blogger pack as you, but I did want to put in my 2 cents :) I also shifted my loyalties a little, or at least questioned them. I was a little Yorkie, but now after reading the Red Queen, I don't know! Great review!

-Kate the Book Buff
http://www.thebookbuff.blogspot.com

LAMusing said...

Yorkist. The "winner" can always re-write history, and Richard III has been the scapegoat.
adrianecoros(at)gmail(dot)com

LAMusing said...

TWEET! http://twitter.com/LAMusing/status/20872693827
adrianecoros(at)gmail(dot)com